Shoe Sensation
ent_f74affc374abe002a5eb9035
Disclosures
5
State AG · 5 jurisdictions
Incidents
1
filings grouped by incident
Max affected reported
69
as filed · State AG MD
Leak-site claims
0
none in sample
Identity resolution
- Canonical name
- Shoe Sensation
- Normalized
- shoe sensation— dedupe via name-norm; Microsoft / MSFT collapse to one row
- GLEIF LEI
- No match
- SEC EDGAR CIK
- None — not an SEC registrant
- Domain
- None on record
Disclosure history (5)newest first
- 🍁Vermont State AGas victim2025-02-27
Shoe Sensation notified consumers of a data breach occurring in August 2024, discovered in December 2024. Unauthorized access exposed customer names, addresses, and credit card numbers. The company took the website offline, removed compromised code, applied security patches, and engaged Kroll to provide free identity monitoring services to affected individuals.
- 🦞Maine State AGas victim2025-02-24
Shoe Sensation, Inc. experienced an external system breach that was discovered on December 5, 2025. The breach, which occurred on August 12, 2024, affected 15 Maine residents. Affected individuals were notified on February 21, 2025, and offered 12 months of credit monitoring services.
- ⛰️New Hampshire State AGas victim2025-02-21
Shoe Sensation, Inc. notified the NH AG of unauthorized access to its systems in August 2024, discovered on Dec 5, 2024. The incident affected approximately 16 New Hampshire residents' personal information. The company took the website offline, removed compromised code, applied security patches, and offered credit monitoring via Kroll.
- 🦬Montana State AGas victim2025-02-21
Shoe Sensation, Inc reported a data breach to the Montana Attorney General. The breach was reported on 2025-02-21. The breach occurred from 08/01/2024 to 08/28/2024. 19 Montana residents were affected.
- 🦀Maryland State AGas victim2025-02-20
Shoe Sensation, Inc. notified the Maryland AG of unauthorized access to its systems in August 2024, discovered in December 2024. The incident exposed customer names, addresses, and credit card numbers for approximately 69 Maryland residents. The company took its website offline, removed compromised code, applied security patches, and engaged Kroll for credit monitoring services.