WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
15 disclosures across 12 jurisdictions · 2026-07-01 → 2026-08-21. Severity score: 3 across 1 incident (max per incident: crit=4 high=3 med=2 low=1; per-filing sum: 34).
1825-day window · this entity as victim
apparent from filed dates · see trail
of 5 clock verdicts
max per incident · per-filing sum: 34
Sector context · Professional Services
- This entity:
- 20.0% on-time (n=5 clock verdicts)
- Sector cohort:
- 16.9% on-time (n=1,755 clock verdicts)
Cohort: 4,441 filings from 1,998 organisations carrying NAICS 54 on the filing itself, same 1825-day window; merged entities counted once. Both percentages count clock verdicts through the same registry — a filing with no evaluable clock is excluded from both rather than counted as on time.
Compliance timing by regulator
Notice timing computed from the dates recorded in each filing — an indicative estimate from an automated clock, not a legal determination. Click any chip for this entity's source filings.
- Washington0 on-time · 1 review · 0 late · 1
- Texas1 on-time · 0 late · 1
- Massachusetts0 on-time · 2 review · 0 late · 2
- Oregon0 on-time · 1 late · 1
- South Carolina0 on-time · 0 late · 1 informational · 1
us-ca — clock not computable from the dates recorded in the filings
us-de — no notification-clock framework implemented for this jurisdiction
us-il — no notification-clock framework implemented for this jurisdiction
us-in — no notification-clock framework implemented for this jurisdiction
us-ne — no notification-clock framework implemented for this jurisdiction
us-nh — no notification-clock framework implemented for this jurisdiction
us-vt — clock not computable from the dates recorded in the filings
Discovery dates behind these clocks: 3 ag web form · 6 letter-grounded · 3 occurrence date. Only a date the notification letter itself states is fully defensible; a date derived from another field makes the verdict indicative.
Regulators holding filings from this entity
Every regulator that has received a visible filing naming this entity, all time — filings first.
- Massachusetts State AG (2)
- New Hampshire State AG (2)
- Texas State AG (2)
- California State AG (1)
- Delaware State AG (1)
- Illinois State AG (1)
- Indiana State AG (1)
- Nebraska State AG (1)
- Oregon State AG (1)
- South Carolina State AG (1)
- Vermont State AG (1)
- Washington State AG (1)
Breach History (5-Year Lookback)
Historical incident recurrence, cumulative exposure, and per-jurisdiction compliance record
within lookback window
late notice filings
median days between incidents
Per-jurisdiction compliance record
| Jurisdiction | On-time | Late | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| us-ma | 0 | 2 | 0% |
| us-or | 0 | 1 | 0% |
| us-sc | 0 | 0 | — |
| us-tx | 1 | 0 | 100% |
| us-wa | 0 | 1 | 0% |
Cumulative data type exposure
Disclosure timeline
Most-recent 100 filings. Click a row to open the disclosure detail.
| Filed | Source | Jurisdiction | Severity | Affected | Clocks missed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-21 | state_ag | us-tx | High | 80.5K? | |
| 2026-08-19 | state_ag | us-nh | High | 3.1Kstate | |
| 2026-08-12 | state_ag | us-de | Medium | — | |
| 2026-08-12 | state_ag | us-sc | High | 14.5Kstate | |
| 2026-08-05 | state_ag | us-or | Medium | 35.2K | OR AG >45d· discovery date: occurrence date |
| 2026-07-15 | state_ag | us-wa | Medium | 692state | WA AG >30d· discovery date: occurrence date |
| 2026-07-14 | state_ag | us-tx | High | 4.7K | |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-ca | Medium | — | |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-ne | Medium | — | |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-ma | Medium | 42state | MA AG >30d |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-ma | Medium | 42state | MA AG >30d |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-vt | Medium | 11state | |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-nh | Medium | 35state | |
| 2026-07-10 | state_ag | us-in | Medium | 33.2K | |
| 2026-07-01 | state_ag | us-il | Medium | — |