Philips Respironics
Clustered 2 filings across 1 jurisdiction · filed Apr 16, 2024. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_e12a12d353b84fc6 · merged by llm · confidence 80%
Litigation Timing
SupplementalTime between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Incident timeline
No discovery date is recorded on any filing in this cluster, so the notification delay is not computable. Dashed segments fill in as filings merge.
Member cascade — every filing about this breach
- APR 16HHS OCRHHS OCR noticefirst filing · states nationwide total 1,338day 0
- APR 16HHS OCRHHS OCR noticemost recent · states nationwide total 5,576day 0
- Watching for additional filings — new sources merge into this incident automatically.
Roll-up facts — reconciled across members
- Breach window
- —
- Discovered
- —
- Data types
- PHI · Health (basic) · Identity (basic) HHS OCR
- Attack vector
- Unauthorized Access HHS OCR
- Response
- Notified HHS · Notified affected individuals · Notified the media HHS OCR
Each fact cites the member filing that establishes it; when filings conflict, every value shows with its source.
Evidence ladder — rungs this incident occupies
No leak-site claim on record for this incident.
No press coverage linked yet.
Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.
No SEC filing or victim statement yet.
Merge provenance
- Method
- llm
- Confidence
- 0.80 · below the 0.85 auto-merge floor
- Audit
- Every link edge records its method, confidence and model + prompt versions (80% is the strongest edge).
Merges are reversible — a wrong link can be detached with its audit trail intact. How merging works.
Filing velocity
Spread
0 days
vs. multi-state median
20.0× faster
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.