Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✓ CA 60-day OK · 29dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedhigh sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
4
PII · Government ID · Financial
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Sensitive data
identity_government
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Nov 15, 2025 → Nov 16, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri, PC notified clients of unauthorized access to firm systems containing personal information, including names, contact info, case files, financial info, SSNs, and driver's licenses. Access occurred Nov 15-16, 2025; discovered Nov 16, 2025. Systems secured, cybersecurity experts engaged, and 12 months of credit monitoring offered.
CA 60-day OK · 29d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.