Alert Medical Alarms reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-06-17 and was reported on 2026-02-18. 211 Indiana residents were affected. 39,218 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 39,218
Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filing window Feb 18, 2026 → Feb 20, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_d4a3f7067d2040c2 · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
IN TX
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Jun 17, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Jun 17, 2025
Reported by TEXAS AG filing
Alert Medical Alarms reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-06-17 and was reported on 2026-02-18. 211 Indiana residents were affected. 39,218 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 39,218
Alert Medical Alarms based in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, a other entity reported a data breach to the Texas Attorney General. The breach was discovered on 2025-06-17 and reported on 2026-02-20. 1,239 Texas residents were affected. 39,218 individuals affected in total. Types of information involved: Name of individual;Social Security Number Information;Financial Information (e.g. account number, credit or debit card number);Medical Information;Health Insurance Information;Date of Birth. Consumers were notified via U.S. Mail.
Affected (this filing): 1,239
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.