Accela — December 2025 breach
Clustered 3 records across 2 jurisdictions: 2 filings and 1 leak-site claim · filed Sep 14, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_c42af30c602f4133 · merged by deterministic · confidence 100%
Litigation Timing
Days between the first sighting of the earliest-seen leak-site claim and the first regulatory filing. Measured from when the aggregator first saw the post, not the crew's own (often earlier) date. Positive = the claim came first (public exposure before disclosure). Negative = the claim trailed the filing, so there was no pre-disclosure leak. Counts regulatory filings only — press coverage is not a regulatory disclosure.
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Incident timeline
No discovery date is recorded on any filing in this cluster, so the notification delay is not computable. Dashed segments fill in as filings merge.
Member cascade — every filing and leak-site claim in this incident
- DEC 23Leak siteeverest postfirst record · attacker claim · unverifiedday 0
- SEP 14CA AGCA AG noticeno count statedauto-linked+264d
- SEP 14IN AGIN AG noticemost recent · states nationwide total 56auto-linked+264d
- Watching for additional filings — new sources merge into this incident automatically.
Roll-up facts — reconciled across members
- Breach window
- Dec 11, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025 CA AG
- Discovered
- —
- Data types
- Identity (basic) · PII CA AG
- Attack vector
- Unauthorized Access CA AG
Each fact cites the member filing that establishes it; when filings conflict, every value shows with its source.
Count reconciliation
per-state reported counts
Nationwide (stated in a filing)
56
Sum of filed state slices
50· 89.3% of stated
11% of the stated total lives in states whose filings carry no count — the dashed share shrinks as filings land.
Evidence ladder — rungs this incident occupies
Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.
No press coverage linked yet.
Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.
No SEC filing or victim statement yet.
Merge provenance
- Method
- deterministic
- Confidence
- 1.00 · above the 0.85 auto-merge floor
- Audit
- Every link edge records its method, confidence and model + prompt versions (100% is the strongest edge).
Merges are reversible — a wrong link can be detached with its audit trail intact. How merging works.
Filing velocity
Spread
0 days
vs. multi-state median
20.0× faster
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. This page states only what the linked filings agree on; each filing's own account stays on its own record, linked from the timeline below.
The weekly clock on records like this one
The Disclosure Clock is a weekly briefing on what landed in the disclosure record, and the gap between the criminals' post and the regulator's filing — measured on the whole record, with the method shown.
Weekly. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe, and the address goes nowhere else.