Lincoln Retirement Services Company reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-03-19 and was reported on 2025-03-25. 1 Indiana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 1
Clustered 3 filings across 1 jurisdiction · filing window Mar 25, 2025 → May 6, 2025. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_c3dee5cb4bbd41f4 · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
IN
all State AG
per-filing reported counts
State AGs report only their own residents; bars show per-filing counts.
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Mar 19, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Lincoln Retirement Services Company reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-03-19 and was reported on 2025-03-25. 1 Indiana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 1
Lincoln Retirement Services Company reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-03-20 and was reported on 2025-03-25. 2 Indiana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 2
Lincoln Retirement Services Company LLC reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-04-21 and was reported on 2025-05-06. 3 Indiana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 3
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.