Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filed Oct 15, 2025. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_b9bd91cc6c4344a6 · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
PII · Government ID
IN ME
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Jun 11, 2024
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Jun 12, 2024
Reported by MAINE AG filing
Grand Traverse County Michigan reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2024-06-11 and was reported on 2025-10-15. 8 Indiana residents were affected. 782 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 782
Grand Traverse County, Michigan discovered unauthorized system activity in its network environment on June 12, 2024. A digital forensic investigation determined that personal information (names and Social Security numbers) in compromised network locations could have been accessed by an unauthorized third party. 782 individuals were affected in total, with 1 Maine resident. Notification letters were sent October 9, 2025. CyberScout credit monitoring services were offered to affected individuals.
Affected (this filing): 1
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.