Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✗ CA 60-day late · 247dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedlow sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
1
PII
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Jun 8, 2025 → Jun 9, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Fishman, Larsen & Callister, P.C. experienced unauthorized access to personal information on or about June 8, 2025, discovered on June 9, 2025. The incident involved names and likely Social Security numbers. The firm engaged cybersecurity experts, notified the FBI, and is offering credit monitoring services to affected individuals.
CA 60-day late · 247dCA AG copy ≤15d · 0d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.