Office Peeps Inc reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-11-26 and was reported on 2026-01-29. 1 Indiana residents were affected. 406 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 406
Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filed Jan 29, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_9caf4b8173904dec · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
IN VT
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Nov 26, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Nov 26, 2025
Reported by VERMONT AG filing
Office Peeps Inc reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-11-26 and was reported on 2026-01-29. 1 Indiana residents were affected. 406 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 406
Office Peeps Inc. notified Vermont AG of a data breach discovered on November 26, 2025. An unauthorized actor accessed customer names and additional data elements. The company engaged forensic investigators, secured the network, and is offering complimentary identity monitoring via Kroll. The investigation determined the scope on December 22, 2025.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.