DisclosureLens
Leak SiteEU DPAEnforced2 recordsLifecycle stage 3 of 3: EnforcedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedransomhub
Merged incident · 2 records

NTT Data Romania SA

Clustered 2 records across 1 jurisdiction: 1 enforcement record and 1 leak-site claim · decided Mar 25, 2025. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →

Agreement not assessableMerge100%

Determination

Enforced

Members

2 records

States

—

Affected · reported

—

First → last enforcement record

Mar 25, 2025

Merge confidence

100%

incident inc_963f4c0730f24c1c · merged by deterministic · confidence 100%

Litigation Timing

Not recorded for this incident

Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.

Member cascade — every enforcement record and leak-site claim in this incident

  1. JUN 15Leak siteransomhub postfirst record · attacker claim · unverifiedday 0
  2. MAR 25EU DPAEU DPA noticemost recent · no count stated+283d
  3. Watching for additional filings — new sources merge into this incident automatically.

Roll-up facts — reconciled across members

Breach window
—
Discovered
—

Each fact cites the member filing that establishes it; when filings conflict, every value shows with its source.

Evidence ladder — rungs this incident occupies

Leak-site claim1 member

Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.

Press / market report1 member

Unlocks: incident narrative, operational impact. Still no compliance clock.

State AG / regulator filing

No regulator filing linked yet.

SEC 8-K / victim statement

No SEC filing or victim statement yet.

Merge provenance

Method
deterministic
Confidence
1.00 · above the 0.85 auto-merge floor
Reviewed
operator-reviewed Aug 16, 2026 · at least one link edge was human-adjudicated
Audit
Every link edge records its method, confidence and model + prompt versions (100% is the strongest edge).

Merges are reversible — a wrong link can be detached with its audit trail intact. How merging works.

About this clustering

DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. This page states only what the linked filings agree on; each filing's own account stays on its own record, linked from the timeline below.

The weekly clock on records like this one

The Disclosure Clock is a weekly briefing on what landed in the disclosure record, and the gap between the criminals' post and the regulator's filing — measured on the whole record, with the method shown.

Weekly. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe, and the address goes nowhere else.