State AG filing from South Carolina regarding Dodds, Hennessy, & Stith, LLC. The attached PDF content is empty (4 blank pages). No breach details, dates, or data types are present in the source text.
Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filing window Apr 19, 2021 → Apr 27, 2021. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_941c2beb8568471f · merge_method human · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
ME SC
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Jan 20, 2021 → Feb 1, 2021
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Feb 1, 2021
Reported by MAINE AG filing
State AG filing from South Carolina regarding Dodds, Hennessy, & Stith, LLC. The attached PDF content is empty (4 blank pages). No breach details, dates, or data types are present in the source text.
Dodds Hennessy & Stith, LLC, a South Carolina-based professional services firm, reported an external system breach occurring between January 20 and February 1, 2021. The incident affected 13,026 individuals, including 9 Maine residents. The breach involved the acquisition of names combined with driver's license numbers. The firm notified affected individuals in writing on March 26, 2021, and provided 12 months of credit monitoring and identity theft recovery services.
Affected (this filing): 13,026
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.