Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✓ CA 60-day OK · 37dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedmoderate sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
2
Health (basic) · Identity (basic)
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Aug 20, 2013
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
On August 20, 2013, a contracted Madera County WIC employee mistakenly gave paper records containing name and expected date of delivery to another participant. The records were immediately returned upon discovery. The California Department of Public Health notified affected individuals on September 26, 2013, and is reviewing procedures to prevent recurrence.
CA 60-day OK · 37d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.