Quantum Imaging and Therapeutic Associates, Inc. reported a data breach to the Montana Attorney General. The breach was reported on 2022-05-09. The breach occurred on 10/7/2021. 22 Montana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 22
Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filed May 9, 2022. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_8a495c209bcc4e6d · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
MT NH
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Oct 7, 2021
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Oct 7, 2021
Reported by NEW HAMPSHIRE AG filing
Quantum Imaging and Therapeutic Associates, Inc. reported a data breach to the Montana Attorney General. The breach was reported on 2022-05-09. The breach occurred on 10/7/2021. 22 Montana residents were affected.
Affected (this filing): 22
Quantum Imaging and Therapeutic Associates, Inc. (QITA) notified the New Hampshire Attorney General of a ransomware attack on October 7, 2021. The incident potentially exposed the personal information of 51 New Hampshire residents, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and health information. QITA engaged forensic investigators and law enforcement, and offered 12 months of credit monitoring and identity theft protection to affected individuals. No evidence of misuse was found.
Affected (this filing): 51
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.