Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✗ CA 60-day late · 193dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedlow sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
1
PII
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Aug 23, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Reisz Siderman Eisenberg, APC experienced unauthorized access to its network on August 23, 2025. The firm engaged third-party forensic specialists and notified federal law enforcement. The incident may have involved first and last names. Complimentary credit monitoring was offered to affected individuals.
CA 60-day late · 193dCA AG copy ≤15d · 0d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.