Unverified threat-actor claim — not a regulatory filing
Attribution, victim identity, and counts shown here derive from a threat actor's public extortion-blog claims, aggregated by ransomware.live. They have not been validated by the victim or any regulator. Treat them as the threat actor's assertion until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure corroborates them.
Unverified claim. Posted to a leak site Aug 24, 2022 by Ransomexx; no regulatory filing has corroborated it yet.
In addition to previous leak: employees credentials, if you need netflix, battle.net, paypal or pornhub account feel free to use it; employees personal photos/videos; confidential BRP documents from several employees desktops/laptops. Why it's posted separately? They forces us to increase damage of the attack due to their negotiations team.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.