MTI America LLC reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-09-06 and was reported on 2026-02-06. 8 Indiana residents were affected. 1,555 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 1,555
Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filed Feb 6, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_66b0c7016d5640d2 · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
IN NH
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Sep 6, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Oct 10, 2025
Reported by NEW HAMPSHIRE AG filing
MTI America LLC reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-09-06 and was reported on 2026-02-06. 8 Indiana residents were affected. 1,555 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 1,555
MTI America, LLC notified the New Hampshire Attorney General of a security breach involving unauthorized access to its network between September 6 and 9, 2025. The incident was discovered on October 10, 2025. The breach affected five New Hampshire residents, whose names and Social Security numbers were potentially accessed. MTI notified affected individuals on February 6, 2026, and offered 12 months of credit monitoring.
Affected (this filing): 5
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.