Clustered 3 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filing window Mar 20, 2026 → Jul 21, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_5eddd6f645244e1c · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Gap between first leak claim and first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
TX
Leak Site · State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Tange , Mann & Garza is a full-service accounting firm offering a broad range of services for individuals, business owners, execut ives, and independent professionals. We will upload 40gb of corporate data soon. Employee passports DL and so on, detailed client information (financials, agreements a nd so on), NDA, etc.
Tange , Mann & Garza is a full-service accounting firm offering a broad range of services for individuals, business owners, execut ives, and independent professionals. We will upload 40gb of corporate data soon. Employee passports DL and so on, detailed client information (financials, agreements a nd so on), NDA, etc.
May 20, 2026
Reported by TEXAS AG filing
Tange, Mann & Garza, P.C. based in Houston, Texas, a financial services entity reported a data breach to the Texas Attorney General. The breach was discovered on 2026-05-20 and reported on 2026-07-21. 691 Texas residents were affected. 737 individuals affected in total. Types of information involved: Name of individual;Social Security Number Information;Driver’s License number;Financial Information (e.g. account number, credit or debit card number);Date of Birth. Consumers were notified via U.S. Mail.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.
Affected (this filing): 691