Clustered 2 filings across 2 jurisdictions · filing window Jun 20, 2025 → Jun 23, 2025. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_57f226177658420f · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Identity (basic) · Credentials
CA IN
all State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Mar 12, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
May 5, 2025
Reported by CALIFORNIA AG filing
The Mindfuel Foundation reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2025-03-12 and was reported on 2025-06-20. 1,510 Indiana residents were affected. 199,506 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 199,506
The Mindfuel Foundation disclosed that a snapshot of a historical testing database, potentially containing limited production data (names, emails, phone numbers, usernames, hashed passwords) from before May 2021, was placed in a location accessible to developers by a third-party service provider and may have been viewed by web crawlers on May 5, 2025. The organization removed the data, reset affected passwords, and implemented new secure file transfer and legacy account removal processes.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.