Confirmed breach. Intrusion Sep 25, 2024–Mar 11, 2025, discovered Sep 25, 2024 — the first regulatory filing landed 286 days later (flagged late). 460 individuals reported across the linked filings.
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksVermont✗ VT AG >45 bdayFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedlow sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
460
Data types
2
Identity (basic) · PII
Jurisdictions
2
IN VT
Linked filings
2
all State AG
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Sep 25, 2024 → Mar 11, 2025
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Pacific Center for Financial Services notified consumers of unauthorized access to an employee email account between Sept 25, 2024 and March 11, 2025. The incident involved compromised credentials. Affected data included names and other personal information. PCFS secured the account, notified law enforcement, and offered 12 months of credit monitoring.
VT AG >45 bday
🏎️Indiana State AGMost recentlinked via multistate filing link · 100%
Pacific Center for Financial Services reported a data breach to the Indiana Attorney General. The breach occurred on 2024-09-25 and was reported on 2025-07-08. 2 Indiana residents were affected. 460 individuals affected in total.
Affected (this filing): 460
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.