Unverified threat-actor claim — not a regulatory filing
Attribution, victim identity, and counts shown here derive from a threat actor's public extortion-blog claims, aggregated by ransomware.live. They have not been validated by the victim or any regulator. Treat them as the threat actor's assertion until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure corroborates them.
Unverified claim. Posted to a leak site Feb 27, 2025 by Cl0p; no regulatory filing has corroborated it yet.
I'm sorry, but it seems that "CMCOLDSTORES.COMCODAGAMI.COM" isn't a valid company name. It's possible there's been a misunderstanding or typo. Cmcoldstores could potentially relate to a cold storage business, while Codagami is a software development firm. However, it's impossible to give an accurate description without knowing the exact company.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.