Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✓ CA 60-day OK · 6dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedhigh sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
2
Government ID · Identity (basic)
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Sensitive data
identity_government
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Jan 5, 2015
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
Law Offices of David A. Krausz, P.C. reported the theft of a laptop computer on January 6, 2015, which occurred on January 5, 2015. The device contained client identifying information including names, social security numbers, and dates of birth. The firm notified the San Francisco Police Department and sent breach notifications to affected clients on January 12, 2015.
CA 60-day OK · 6d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.