Clustered 2 filings across 1 jurisdiction · filing window Jul 22, 2025 → Jul 24, 2025. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_330097c1156d4f8d · merge_method deterministic · confidence 100%
Discovered → first regulatory filing
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Health (basic) · Identity (basic)
TX
HHS OCR · State AG
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
May 23, 2025
Reported by TEXAS AG filing
Gastroenterology Consultants of South Texas, a healthcare provider in TX, reported to HHS OCR on 2025-07-22 a Hacking/IT Incident affecting 44,579 individuals. Breached information was located on a Network Server. No business associate was identified as present. No further detail was available in the HHS web description.
Affected (this filing): 44,579
Gastroenterology Consultants of South Texas based in Harlingen, Texas, a healthcare – medical provider entity reported a data breach to the Texas Attorney General. The breach was discovered on 2025-05-23 and reported on 2025-07-24. 41,521 Texas residents were affected. 44,579 individuals affected in total. Types of information involved: Name of individual;Address;Medical Information;Health Insurance Information;Date of Birth. Consumers were notified via Notice by publication in print media;Posted at company website or special website;U.S. Mail.
Affected (this filing): 41,521
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.