Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.
Regulatory clocksCalifornia✓ CA 60-day OK · 50dFull clock table in Litigation Timeline
State AGConfirmedLifecycle stage 2 of 3: ConfirmedUnverified claimConfirmedEnforcedhigh sensitivity
Affected (total reported)
—
Data types
4
PII · Identity (basic) · Financial account
Jurisdictions
1
CA
Linked filings
1
all State AG
Sensitive data
financial_credentials
Timeline
Earliest sighting first · deep chronology in Litigation Timeline
Breach window
Oct 12, 2016 → May 31, 2017
When the intrusion reportedly occurred, per the linked filings
SportsMem, Inc. notified California regulators of a data breach involving unauthorized code injected into its checkout page (www.sportsmemorabilia.com). The malicious code potentially captured payment card information, names, and addresses from October 12, 2016, to May 31, 2017. The company removed the code, engaged forensic experts, and notified law enforcement.
CA 60-day OK · 50d
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.