CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. — April 2026 breach
Clustered 7 filings across 5 jurisdictions · filing window May 3, 2026 → Aug 7, 2026. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →
incident inc_1cdc008c75ed4750 · merged by deterministic · confidence 100%
Litigation Timing
SupplementalDiscovered → first regulatory filing
Range of discovered_at dates across filings
Days between the first leak-site claim and the first regulatory filing. Positive = the claim came first (public exposure before disclosure). Negative = the claim trailed the filing, so there was no pre-disclosure leak. Counts regulatory filings only — press coverage is not a regulatory disclosure.
Time between earliest and latest filing
Not recorded for this incident
Materiality delta · SEC filing delay — no SEC 8-K in this cluster.
Sensitive data
identity_governmentIncident timeline
Dashed segments are unestablished, not zero — they fill in as filings merge into this incident.
Member cascade — every filing about this breach
- MAY 3Leak siteshinyhunters postfirst filing · attacker claim · unverifiedoperator-confirmedday 0
- MAY 3Leak siteqilin postattacker claim · unverifiedoperator-confirmedday 0
- AUG 7VT AGVT AG notice2 VT residentsoperator-confirmed+96d
- AUG 7CA AGCA AG noticeno count statedoperator-confirmed+96d
- AUG 7MA AGMA AG notice20 MA residentsoperator-confirmed+96d
- AUG 7NH AGNH AG noticemost recent · 4 NH residentsauto-linked+96d
- Watching for additional filings — new sources merge into this incident automatically.
Roll-up facts — reconciled across members
- Breach window
- Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026 CA AG
- Discovered
- Apr 29, 2026· 8d undetected CA AG + MA AG + NH AG
- Data types
- Identity (basic) · Government ID VT AG + MA AG + CA AG +1
- Attack vector
- Unauthorized Access CA AG
Each fact cites the member filing that establishes it; when filings conflict, every value shows with its source.
Affected residents by state
per-state reported counts
State AGs report only their own residents; teal bars show each state's reported slice.
Evidence ladder — rungs this incident occupies
Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.
Unlocks: incident narrative, operational impact. Still no compliance clock.
Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.
No SEC filing or victim statement yet.
Merge provenance
- Method
- deterministic
- Confidence
- 1.00 · above the 0.85 auto-merge floor
- Reviewed
- operator-reviewed Aug 14, 2026 · at least one link edge was human-adjudicated
- Audit
- Every link edge records its method, confidence and model + prompt versions (100% is the strongest edge).
Merges are reversible — a wrong link can be detached with its audit trail intact. How merging works.
Filing velocity
Spread
100 days
Cadence
~1 / 16.7d
vs. multi-state median
12.5× slower
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. This page states only what the linked filings agree on; each filing's own account stays on its own record, linked from the timeline below.
The weekly clock on records like this one
The Disclosure Clock is a weekly briefing on what landed in the disclosure record, and the gap between the criminals' post and the regulator's filing — measured on the whole record, with the method shown.
Weekly. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe, and the address goes nowhere else.