GrabCar
ent_c31851654eca5c4932379eb4
Disclosures
4
Singapore PDPC · 1 jurisdiction
Multi-filing incidents
—
no multi-filing incident in sample
Max affected reported
120,747
nationwide · Singapore PDPC SG
Leak-site claims
0
none in sample
Identity resolution
- Canonical name
- GrabCar
- Normalized
- grabcar— dedupe via name-norm; Microsoft / MSFT collapse to one row
- GLEIF LEI
- No match
- SEC EDGAR CIK
- None — not an SEC registrant
- Domain
- None on record
Disclosure history (4)newest first
- SINGAPORESingapore PDPCas victim2020-09-10
A financial penalty of $10,000 was imposed and a direction was issued to Grabcar for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to prevent the unauthorised access of GrabHitch drivers’ and passengers’ personal data via its mobile application. Click here to find out more.
- SINGAPORESingapore PDPCas victim2019-06-11
A financial penalty of $16,000 was imposed on GrabCar for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal data of its customers from unauthorised disclosure. Personal data of a customer was disclosed to one other customer via an email sent out by GrabCar. Click here to find out more.
- SINGAPORESingapore PDPCas victim2019-06-11
Directions were issued to GrabCar for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements for GrabHitch drivers to protect the personal data of passengers that used GrabHitch services. Personal data of some GrabHitch passengers were disclosed by GrabHitch drivers without consent on social media. Click here to find out more.
- SINGAPORESingapore PDPCas victim2018-10-03
A financial penalty of $6,000 was imposed on Grabcar for failing to make reasonable security arrangements to prevent the unauthorised disclosure of GrabHitch drivers’ personal data. Click here to find out more.