DisclosureLens
SINGAPOREUnknownLow

Prosegur Singapore Pte Ltd

bd_f7cf379dbc2de9d0 · schema v1 · pii pii-v2

Severity

Low

Discovered

—

Filed

Sep 21, 2026

To disclose

—

Affected

Not disclosed

Confidence

95%
Full breach record for Prosegur Singapore Pte Ltd →

Regulator's decision — not a breach notification

This record is a regulator's decision, not the organisation's own breach notice. Breach-notification fields (discovery date, notification clock) are structurally absent — what this source establishes is the outcome and the provisions the decision cites.

Background Prosegur Singapore Pte. Ltd. (the “Organisation”) informed the Personal Data Protection Commission (the “Commission”) on 27 August 2025 of a personal data breach involving its file servers (the “Incident”). The Organisation established that the threat actor (“TA”) had gained initial unauthorised access to the Organisation’s file servers on 23 June 2025, using compromised login credentials of a service account via Virtual Private Network, which subsequently resulted in the exfiltration of a subset of the affected personal data of the Organisation’s employees, former employees and contractors. The personal data of 21,421 individuals were affected, with a smaller number exfiltrated. The types of personal data affected included a combination of names, addresses, telephone/mobile numbers, NRIC/FIN/passport numbers, countries of origin, photographs, dates of birth, salary histories and a smaller subset of health – mainly vaccination information, belonging to approximately 2,514 individuals. Upon discovery of the Incident, the Organisation took prompt remedial actions including isolating the compromised server, restricting access rights to databases to reduce exposure and renewing all Active Directory user credentials to strengthen identity control and access management. The Organisation also notified the affected individuals. The data breach had likely occurred as the Organisation did not implement multi factor authentication (“MFA”) for remote access to the compromised service account and did not fully apply network segmentation to protect personal data in its possession. The Organisation had other protective measures in place including network security with two pairs of firewall, patch management and endpoint solutions. Voluntary Undertaking Having considered the circumstances of the case, the Commission accepted a voluntary undertaking (the “Undertaking”) from

Incident timeline — partial

? — ?

Breach window unknown

Sep 21, 2026

Filed

—

No linked breach filing · watching

Compliance clocks stay unassessable until a breach filing is linked. This record is the regulator's action, not a breach notice. Dashed segments fill in automatically when corroboration arrives.

Evidence ladder

Leak-site claim

Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.

Press / market report

Unlocks: incident narrative, operational impact. Still no compliance clock.

State AG / regulator filingThis record

Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.

SEC 8-K / victim statement

Unlocks: materiality, stated response, full audit trail. Ceiling removed.

Source ceiling

  • outcome + obligations
  • fine (SGD) and affected count where a grounds document states them
  • discovery date
  • notification clock

See the underlying breach notice, if any.

Prosegur Singapore Pte Ltd — PDPA enforcement decision (2026) · DisclosureLens