Frost & Sullivan
bd_e41e7f31932eb722 · schema v1 · pii pii-v1
Full breach record for Frost & Sullivan →2 incidents on fileThreat-actor claim — not a regulatory filing
This row is a claim by the ransomware group Akira on its public extortion blog. It has not been validated by the victim or any regulator. Treat attribution and counts as the threat actor's assertion until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure corroborates them.
Source: Ransomware.live
Post text · scraped from the leak site
Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Consulting Company, partners with clients to accelerate their growth. Planning is always not an easy process and sometimes leads to a failure. These guys underestimated their data and we suppose their clients won't be happy seeing news of this leak. Tons of contracts with big names of international businesses, personal documents including top management and more. >90GBs of data will be available soon.
J jump to incidentP pin to compareR raw source
Incident timeline — mostly unverified
? — ?
Breach window unknown
Jul 28, 2023
Claim posted
—
Corroborated · see linked filings
Compliance clocks stay unassessable until a regulatory filing lands. Dashed segments fill in automatically when corroboration arrives.
Claim → filing
—
Compliance clock
Not assessable
Linked disclosures
Why this link?Regulatory filings (5) · sorted by filing gap
- Montana State AGbd_184a8b1f0d889d982023-09-05 · +39dCandidate
- Massachusetts State AGbd_2d742979ea441e262023-09-05 · +39dVerified by operator
- New Hampshire State AGbd_407c587322cd89722023-09-05 · +39dVerified
- Maine State AGbd_e4520694f12512722023-09-05 · +39dVerified
Show 1 more filing ↓Show fewer ↑up to 39d gap
- Vermont State AGbd_f51afad63d17b41e2023-09-05 · +39dVerified
Filing propagation · 6 filings · 5 states
View merged incident ↗Pattern: first filing Jul 28, last Sep 5 (VT) — a 39-day rolling notification. Rolling spreads often mean counsel is filing as thresholds trip per state. Why this link?
Evidence ladder
Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.
Unlocks: incident narrative, operational impact. Still no compliance clock.
Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.
Unlocks: materiality, stated response, full audit trail. Ceiling removed.
Source ceiling
- actor name
- victim claim
- ransom/leak status
- discovery date
- materiality
- notification
- affected count
- confirmed data types
- compliance clock
The ✕ fields stay blank until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure lands.
akira
According to ransomware.live, The Akira ransomware group is said to have emerged in March 2023, and there's much speculation about its ties to the former CONTI ransomware group. It's worth noting that with the end of CONTI's operation, several affiliates migrated to independent campaigns such as Royal, BlackBasta, and others. According to some reports, Akira affiliates also work with other ransomware operations, such as Snatch and BlackByte, as an open directory of tools used by an Akira operator was identified, which also had connections to the Snatch ransomware. The first version of the Akira ransomware was written in C++ and appended files with the '.akira' extension, creating a ransom note named 'akira_readme.txt,' partially based on the Conti V2 source code. However, on June 29, 2023, a decryptor for this version was reportedly released by Avast. Subsequently, a version was released that fixed the decryption flaw on July 2, 2023. Since then, the new version is said to be written in Rust, this time called 'megazord.exe,' and it changes the extension to '.powerranges' for encrypted files. Most of Akira's initial access vectors use brute-force attempts on Cisco VPN devices (which use single-factor authentication only). Additionally, exploitation of CVEs: CVE-2019-6693 and CVE-2022-40684 for initial access has been identified. Source: https://github.com/crocodyli/ThreatActors-TTPs