NEC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd

bd_df9d916f819c7c04 · schema v1 · pii pii-v1

Background On 28 August 2017, the Personal Data Protection Commission (the “Commission”) received a data breach notification from JK TruData Solutions Pte Ltd (“JK TruData”) regarding a print job request via email (the “Email”) that it had received from NEC Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (“NEC”). The Email enclosed personal data that had been received by NEC from the common end customer (“Customer”) of both NEC and JK TruData (the “Incident”). JK TruData informed the Commission that it was not the intended recipient of the Email. The Commission’s investigations showed that NEC employed a two-step process when sending relevant data to appointed printing vendors: (a) first, NEC would send the relevant data to the printing agent via an automated email function; (b) thereafter, NEC would follow up manually with an email to confirm the receipt of the automated email; NEC’s SOP required the staff doing this to check that the recipient was correct before sending the email, and for all confidential data to be encrypted. In this Incident, a mistake was made at the second step – an NEC employee sent the follow-up email (with the same content and attachment contained in the automated email without any encryption) to JK TruData instead of the correct printing agent. Although the Commission’s investigation findings suggested that NEC had not fully complied with its obligations under the PDPA, the Commission recognised that there was limited impact from the disclosure. The Commission found that disclosure of personal data had been limited to two authorised printing vendors of the Customer, one of which was JK TruData themselves, who were already bound in contract to the Customer to keep such information confidential. JK TruData also was already familiar with the types of personal data contained within the attachment and there was no further disclosure by NEC beyond JK TruData. The Deputy Com

P pin to compareR raw source