Law Offices of Rakesh Mehrotra
bd_d0bac60e53481209 · schema v1 · pii pii-v1
Threat-actor claim — not a regulatory filing
This row is a claim by the ransomware group Triple X on its public extortion blog. It has not been validated by the victim or any regulator. Treat attribution and counts as the threat actor's assertion until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure corroborates them.
Source: Ransomware.live
Post text · scraped from the leak site
https://immigrationonline.com/ 1.5 terabytes of people's data in a immigrationonline law firm. Server overload and lack of updates have caused important data to be exposed to potential leaks. At the same time, many of these financial and tax documents also contain sensitive personal information, including full names, home addresses, Social Security numbers, banking details, and contact information. what will leak ? Confidential court cases : Details of lawsuits, complaints, or defenses that have not yet been filed in court. Financial and banking information : Sensitive client accounts, contracts, or transactions. Intellectual property documents : Such as patents, designs, or business contracts that have not yet been made public. Private correspondence and emails : Communications between the attorney and the client that should remain strictly confidential. what data will leak ? 24,900 passport files sample Tax forms of employees and colleagues sample ID cards and driver’s licenses sample few sample pics: pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 pic 4 pic 5 This is probably the right moment to point out that, at a certain stage, virtually any data breach is still a reversible situation. Companies are usually given an opportunity to contain the damage and resolve the issue albeit at a price. But despite knowing exactly what was happening, and fully understanding that it was putting the security and privacy of its own employees at risk, the company made a calculated decision to let it happen. And now the company will tell its employees: “Sorry, we’ve experienced a data breach, and your passports are now publicly available online.” But they will never say: “We were offered a chance to pay to prevent your passports from being published, but we decided it wasn’t worth it so now they’re on the internet. Sorry.” download data link : http://6qqz6m3b6htudohg2mlf5gdcalonxy3sh5g4dix4mpyirjcgelqqufad.oni
J jump to incidentP pin to compareR raw source
Incident timeline — mostly unverified
? — ?
Breach window unknown
May 12, 2026
Claim posted
—
Corroborated · see linked filings
Compliance clocks stay unassessable until a regulatory filing lands. Dashed segments fill in automatically when corroboration arrives.
Claim → filing
—
Compliance clock
Not assessable
Linked disclosures
Why this link?Regulatory filings (5) · sorted by filing gap
- Nebraska State AGbd_e8e8adb8e0ed42802026-07-08 · +57dVerified
- Vermont State AGbd_23bbc06f3c9045f82026-07-09 · +58dVerified
- Massachusetts State AGbd_8056e820ef0f3fbe2026-07-09 · +58dVerified
- Texas State AGbd_20b99d3ae891d8ff2026-07-10 · +59dVerified
Show 1 more filing ↓Show fewer ↑up to 64d gap
- New Hampshire State AGbd_0b06cf4bf1556ba62026-07-15 · +64dCandidate
Filing propagation · 6 filings · 5 states
View merged incident ↗Pattern: first filing May 12, last Jul 15 (NH) — a 64-day rolling notification. Rolling spreads often mean counsel is filing as thresholds trip per state. Why this link?
Evidence ladder
Attacker assertion only. Establishes: claim date, group, alleged victim.
Unlocks: incident narrative, operational impact. Still no compliance clock.
Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.
Unlocks: materiality, stated response, full audit trail. Ceiling removed.
Source ceiling
- actor name
- victim claim
- ransom/leak status
- discovery date
- materiality
- notification
- affected count
- confirmed data types
- compliance clock
The ✕ fields stay blank until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure lands.