BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE

One linked filing — more sources may join as they report · filed Jul 28, 2023. View entity profile → Other incidents for this victim →

Determination

Confirmed

Members

1 filing

States

Affected · reported

505

First → last filing

Jul 28, 2023

incident inc_f37f791ccf42499f · merged by deterministic

Confirmed breach. 505 individuals reported across the linked filings.

Litigation Timing

Not recorded for this incident

Discovery variance · Leak precedence · Materiality delta · SEC filing delay · Filing span — no leak-site claim in this cluster; no SEC 8-K in this cluster; needs two dated filings.

Regulatory clocksHIPAA✓ HHS notifiedFull clock table in Litigation Timeline

Sensitive data

identity_government

Incident timeline

? — ?breach window unknown

Jul 28, 2023first & only filing

—watching for filings

No discovery date is recorded on any filing in this cluster, so the notification delay is not computable. Dashed segments fill in as filings merge.

Member cascade — every filing about this breach

JUL 28HHS OCRHHS OCR noticeonly filing · states nationwide total 505day 0
Watching for additional filings — new sources merge into this incident automatically.

Roll-up facts — reconciled across members

Breach window: —
Discovered: —
Data types: PHI · Health (basic) · Identity (basic) · Government ID
Attack vector: Unauthorized Access
Response: Implemented additional technical safeguards · Provided complimentary credit monitoring services to affected individuals

Each fact cites the member filing that establishes it; when filings conflict, every value shows with its source.

Evidence ladder — rungs this incident occupies

Leak-site claim

No leak-site claim on record for this incident.

Press / market report

No press coverage linked yet.

State AG / regulator filing1 member

Unlocks: discovery date, data types, affected count, compliance clock.

SEC 8-K / victim statement

No SEC filing or victim statement yet.

About this clustering

DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.