Unverified threat-actor claim — not a regulatory filing
Attribution, victim identity, and counts shown here derive from a threat actor's public extortion-blog claims, aggregated by ransomware.live. They have not been validated by the victim or any regulator. Treat them as the threat actor's assertion until a regulatory filing or victim disclosure corroborates them.
Unverified claim. Posted to a leak site May 16, 2025 by Akira; no regulatory filing has corroborated it yet.
The company creates personal care products and cosmetics.
We are going to upload about 25 GB of corporate data. Lots of pro
jects files, detailed financial data, information about all clien
ts, contracts, correspondence, a bit of employee personal documen
ts, and a lot of other data of such brands as Nelly, Yunsey and F
resh feel cosmetics.
About this clustering
DisclosureLens links filings into incidents through layered matchers: deterministic rules (same source document, multistate filings of one breach, tight-window same-victim pairs), a weighted-similarity scorer for cross-source candidates, and an operator review queue for everything uncertain. Each link records its own method and confidence — shown per filing in the timeline below. The system defaults to NOT merging when uncertain, because a false merge (collapsing two unrelated breaches) is more harmful than a false split (showing related filings separately); uncertain pairs route to human review instead of auto-merging. Filing summaries shown in the timeline are AI-generated extracts — verify each against its linked source.